Open Editorial for Big Data Economy - myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theOpen Editorial for Big Data Economy. Answer: One of the most important principles of the 9 principles of Catholic social thought is the maintenance of human dignity. For a large number of the decades, the political consensus in the different societies of the Western Nations has long held the protection of dignity as the central character to societal Progress. The business world has also paid importance to the protection of Human Rights while serving the customers and the nation (Tsesis, 2014). However, there still remains a question that whether the human dignity and the common good are really the motto of the organization or they are the pathways of securing information from people required for their own benefit. Maintenance of human dignity mainly means respecting the values, beliefs and wishes of different citizens and not pressing others beliefs on them for making more profit. In simple terms the rights of human dignity can be defined as the important sense of self respect and self worth which are possessed by an individual of a particular Nation. Business has often proved to be an important pathway of force for progress and betterment of different people and their quality of life (Assenmacher, 2016). Each and every business should have a concern for maintaining the human dignity by respecting the integrity of different ecosystems, social systems as well as developing a concern for the well being and development of people who are included and touched by the business. However in the present generation, it is seen that the concept of informed consent has been used in various ways by different companies for making their own profit in their business (Sdki Bakkali, 2014). There have been recent debates about the different techniques which are used by different organizations to get that information about the people and then utilizing their information to either develop their business or selling their product or services to such people to make more profits. Therefore new areas of wits and clever thinking had led many companies to develop technologies where informed consents are first taken from the consumers and when the details are provided by the consumers in one area of their requirement, this information is used by the same business organizations for their own purposes or making future sales to the customer. Here lies the main irony when the question arises that whether asking for the informed consent is really serving its purpose of maintaining human dignity. It is sometimes seen that the customer does not himself know what he is consenting for as it seems an obvious process or following of steps to get their products (Allen, 2016). Therefore the business which are destined to provide the greater benefits for the common good are actually gaining benefits from the financial profit made by them through the mirage of informed consent. One of the best examples that can be given is the renowned organization called Google. Over the years Google has developed Technologies which ask for permission as well as filling up of different pages of personal information to gain access to a particular page or site. The information which is taken by Google can be considered as a breach of privacy and confidentiality because they often use this information to provide us with new suggestions that help us in refining our searches. However, there lie the questions that are they not intervening with the privacy of different people. There have been complaints from many consumers who all of a sudden see them being tracked by Google telling them what are the best suggestions for them when they find stranded in traffic. There are different apps like the shopping sites which continuously follow the different searches made by consumers and accordingly send certain suggestions for them which automatically show that they are following each an d every activity of the consumers on the sites (Mahlaola vanDyk, 2016). Two different sets of consumers have been seen. One set of consumers are happy as they get many suggestions from different organizations regarding their shopping, travelling, buying goods and different things. While others are quite unhappy with the procedure as they do not want their own choices as well as different aspects of their personal life to be followed or dictated by different business organizations (Floridi, 2016). However, from the view of common goods and human dignity they are still a big question that are business organizations really helping people with their Technologies or using the strategy of informed consent in name of human dignity for their own benefits? References: Allen, A. L. (2016). Protecting One's Own Privacy in a Big Data Economy.Harv. L. Rev. F.,130, 71. Ashenmacher, G. (2016). Indignity: Redefining the Harm Caused by Data Breaches.Wake Forest L. Rev.,51, 1. Floridi, L. (2016). On human dignity as a foundation for the right to privacy.Philosophy Technology,29(4), 307-312. Mahlaola, T. B., van Dyk, B. (2016). Reasons for Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) data security breaches: Intentional versus non-intentional breaches.health sa gesondheid,21, 271-279. Sadki, S., El Bakkali, H. (2014, April). Towards controlled-privacy in e-health: A comparative study. InMultimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS), 2014 International Conference on(pp. 674-679). IEEE. Tsesis, A. (2014). The right to erasure: Privacy, data brokers, and the indefinite retention of data.Wake Forest L. Rev.,49, 433.